Newsletter 2001
"Proper Administration Committee"
for Utilization of Social Services
The Social Welfare Law was recently devised
and the above committee was formed so that
the social welfare services could be appropriately
utilized by people with dementia. In cases
where the users of services, either the residents
of nursing homes or people cared for at home,
have opinions to express, they can contact
the committee of the local government by
visiting, letter, telephone, facsimile, or
E-mail. These may be complaints about food,
requests to home helpers and staff and so
on.. The committee would try to cope with
those problems by advising, counseling, researching,
coordinating and lobbying.
Questionnaire Survey about the Living Design
Suitable to the Demented
This survey was done in January and February,
2002 and 999 forms were filled in and returned.
Over 60 percent of those replied that rebuilding
or remodeling to make areas "barrier
free" was necessary. If expense
and advice are provided, western style toilets,
barrier free entrances, and bed and chair
styles are preferred. Thirty percent of the
repliers utilized the Public Long Term Care
Insurance System for caregiving equipment,
and 20 percent, remodeled their houses.As
the research on housing of the demented looks
inadequate, it might be important for knowledge
and ideas born from "trial and error"
be systematized..
17th Annual Research Forum (additional
report)
The 17th National forum started with a plenary
talk by Dr. Hasegawa. Some of the main points
he addressed were:
Very soon second generation drugs for Alzheimerfs
disease will be developed. Attention will
also be focused in creating environments
where people with dementia can live in a
normalized manner. He also called for spiritual
well-being in dementia care.
There were also some case reports. One of
these was by a lawyer called Watanabe who
spoke about the rapid deterioration of his
fatherfs dementia and his feelings of hopelessness.
There was also discussion by the head nurse
of a hospital, about dementia care without
resorting to physical restraints. One impressive
report was about a difficult case in a psychiatric
hospital where the patient felt less agitated
when someone stayed by her side until she
went to sleep. Another report dealt with
the desire to make group homes for people
with dementia available also to people evaluated
as Level III to V under the LTCI (Long term
care insurance). There was also a presentation
on music therapy for those who wished to
continue providing dementia care at home.
In the Q & A session, most of the questions
focused on abolition of restraints in dementia
care and on unit care. All in all it was
a very productive and inspirational annual
forum on dementia care.
17th Annual Research Forum
The 17th Research forum was inaugurated in Miyazaki prefecture on October
21st, 2001. Over 1400 people participated and these included members from
various chapters of Alzheimer's Association as well as from the local association
from the host city. Participants also included representatives from social
and medical organizations. The plenary speech was by Prof. emeritus Hasegawa
from St. Mariana University Hospital and there were 6 other speakers who
addressed the issue of "Quality of Care". This year for the first
time sign language was used during the forum.
Younger dementia: how to convey to children? @(Dr. Yoshio Miyake)
It is not only a spouse who is involved
when a person has younger dementia. The family
may have school going children
or children of marriageable age or who are
working. The question is: how do
these children view their parent who has
dementia at a relatively young age?
The other day, the Kyoto chapter of the
Alzheimer Association took up the issue of
children with a parent suffering
from younger dementia. Talks abounded about
children who look down upon the
parent who has dementia, those who refuse
to stay at home since it is too
boring to do so, children who argue with
the caregiver parent and others who
donft mention their ill parent to their
friends. Some also mentioned about
children who are concerned about the implications
of being burdened with
genetic inheritance from their parent.
Of course, it is quite understandable
when a caregiver is unable to reveal to the
society about his or her spouse
falling a victim to an intractable disease
like dementia. They themselves need
time to accept the fact that the person with
whom they have shared their
married life is slipping down the path of
dementia at a young age. And while
the parents are facing such a conflict it
is even harder for children to
express understanding or judgment about their
parentfs illness. As a parent
therefore itis
necessary to have open discussions with the
children about the issues that is
worrying them such as their future, their
jobs, marriage etc. I would like to
encourage such discussions to take place
in future meetings of the Alzheimer
Association. Perhaps it is also necessary
to conduct meetings involving children
as is done in the Alzheimer Associations
in Australia and America.
In the
Kyoto meeting, there were also talks about
children who had openly discussed
about their parentfs dementia with their
friends and others who had decided to
study social welfare in their university
as a consequence of their parentfs
ailment.
Voices from members regarding appeal on younger
dementia
In response to the appeal that the Alzheimer
Association Japan (AAJ) made to the Ministry
of Health Labor and Welfare, we received
numerous letters from all over Japan from
spouses providing dementia care. Here we
introduce excerpts of the letters written
by wives caring for husbands with young onset
dementia.
Case : I am indeed happy and grateful that
the AAJ has decided to take
up the issue of young onset dementia. My
husband turned 60 in January.
Symptoms of dementia started to appear four
years ago. With the implementation
of the LTCI, we started to use day service
twice a week. However, I hardly
had had time to relax, when within three
months I was asked to move him
to a geriatric welfare center. Here too he
was asked to leave the place
after a month. Now I managed to get him admitted
into an old people home
and am continuing with my days amidst much
struggle.
Since the homes for elderly were all full,
I had to admit my husband to a geriatric
welfare center. As it is it takes time for
people like him to get used to a certain
environment, and even the slightest change
can throw him into a state of agitation,
yet only short term stay is available at
these establishments and he has to be moved
around to different places. Even if there
is a special dementia unit, why should people
with dementia be allowed to stay only for
a limited period of time? In the case of
my husband they asked me to move him at the
end of three months. It isn't that he used
to shout or suffer from delusions or show
violent behavior. All he did is try to open
the door and in the process break the weak
lock. I apologized and replaced it. He also
often switched on the fire alarm. All these
incidents turned out to be the reason why
the authorities asked him to be moved.
Special dementia units are isolated places
that are lacking in life. The rooms don't
have chairs, tables, beds, televisions or
any of the bare minimal objects that lend
comfort to the living environment. In a bare
room such as this, my husband who had always
led an active life would carry the blankets
around the room for want of something to
do. That was his daily routine. But his action
obviously caused much concern to the authorities.
I do wish that these dementia units contained
some objects which the residents could touch
freely or have something to do that would
hold their attention. Knowing that a vase
of flowers would be unsafe I filled a basket
with wisteria and put it in his room and
was rewarded with a smile from one of the
elderly residents of the place. Her comment
" its so beautiful. I like to walk by
this place" made me so happy that I
could have cried.
Although allowance for a handicapped person
is only allocated to persons who have an
intractable illness, dementia is not considered
at par to other psychiatric conditions. A
person with dementia who is unable to do
anything on his own is allocated level 2,
yet someone with a pace maker and who can
perform all tasks is given Level 1.
I am taking care of my husband and my 85
year old father-in-law and if there is one
thing I feel strongly about, its this: what
great help and respite it would be if there
was a place that would openly state "come
to us any time you are in need. You can entrust
us to care for your loved one". But
this seems like a fairy tale. Yet I still
harbor the hope that some day there will
be an ideal place where he can live in freedom,
experience life around him, mix with people
young and old and live as long as he does
without the fear of being asked to leave.
It hurts to know about establishments that
reject elderly with dementia.